ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. ディスカッション・ペーパー
  2. 2008年度

Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Mixed Medical Care Services in Japan: What is Equity?

https://grips.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1000
https://grips.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1000
9207d634-10c1-45e2-a337-e16bae53936b
Item type ディスカッションペーパー / Discussion Paper(1)
公開日 2009-03-01
タイトル
タイトル Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Mixed Medical Care Services in Japan: What is Equity?
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Mixed treatments
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Equity in access to health care
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Freedom of choice in health care
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Contingent Valuation Method
資源タイプ
資源タイプ technical report
アクセス権
アクセス権 metadata only access
著者 SAITO, Hiromi

× SAITO, Hiromi

en SAITO, Hiromi

Search repository
SUZUKI, Wataru

× SUZUKI, Wataru

en SUZUKI, Wataru

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 6201
姓名 齋藤, 裕美
言語 ja
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 6202
姓名 鈴木, 亘
言語 ja
著者所属
値 政策研究大学院大学 / National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
著者所属
値 Faculty of Economics, Gakushuin University
分野
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 経済学 / Economics
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The aim of this study is to examine the manner in which a Japanese medical regulation affects equity in health care within an economic framework. The regulation is termed “the ban on mixed treatment.” Mixed treatment is the mixed use of treatments covered by public health insurance as well as those not covered by such insurance in the course of treating an illness. In principle, the Japanese Health Ministry bans mixed treatment.
In order to examine the effect of mixed treatment on equity in health care, we explain the background of Japanese mixed treatment. Thereafter, we introduce a simple economic model and provide suggestions regarding the behavior of patients under the ban rule. Based on the theoretical model, we simulate the behavior of patients using questionnaire data and analyze the results from various perspectives. Here, we create data using the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM).
The results suggest that lifting the ban could reduce differences in treatments among income/asset class but would make payment for health care regressive slightly. The results also suggest that the behavior of patients is different even within the same income/asset class, and there are other factors for receiving uninsured treatment besides capacity to pay.
発行年
値 2009-03
書誌情報 en : GRIPS Discussion Papers

Report No. DP08-18, 発行日 2009-03-01
出版者
出版者 GRIPS Policy Research Center
言語 en
関連サイト
関連タイプ isIdenticalTo
識別子タイプ URI
関連識別子 https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/08-19.html
関連名称 https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/08-19.html
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-20 15:54:53.821640
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3