WEKO3
アイテム
Second-Best Cost–Benefit Analysis with a Microfoundation of Urban Agglomeration
https://doi.org/10.24545/00001060
https://doi.org/10.24545/000010603e1483a8-7800-4aa5-8bcc-750c0a87369a
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
DP11-03.pdf (281.1 kB)
|
|
| Item type | ディスカッションペーパー / Discussion Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2011-05-24 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | Second-Best Cost–Benefit Analysis with a Microfoundation of Urban Agglomeration | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | cost–benefit analysis | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | agglomeration economies | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | monopolistic competition | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | new economic geography | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | second-best economies | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ | technical report | |||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||
| ID登録 (DOI) | 10.24545/00001060 | |||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||
| 著者 |
金本, 良嗣
× 金本, 良嗣
|
|||||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||||
| 識別子 | 6522 | |||||||
| 姓名 | KANEMOTO, Yoshitsugu | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||||
| 値 | 政策研究大学院大学 / National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies | |||||||
| 分野 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | 経済学 / Economics | |||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | Many sources of urban agglomeration, such as the gains from variety, better matching, and knowledge creation and diffusion, involve departures from the first-best world. Benefit evaluation of a transportation project must then take into account changes in excess burden along with any direct user benefits. A number of economists have addressed this issue, and policymakers in some countries, such as in the United Kingdom, have been attempting to include these considerations in their project assessments. By modeling the microstructure of agglomeration economies, we derive second-best benefit evaluation formulae for urban transportation improvements. Previous work has investigated the same problem, but without explicitly modeling the sources of agglomeration economies. Accordingly, our analysis examines whether earlier results remain valid when monopolistic competition with differentiated products provides the microfoundation of the agglomeration economies. By explicitly introducing the rural sector and multiple cities, we also show that the agglomeration benefits depend on where the new workers are from. | |||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | JEL Classification Codes: D43, R12, R13 | |||||||
| 発行年 | ||||||||
| 値 | 2011-05 | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
en : GRIPS Discussion Papers Report No. DP11-03, 発行日 2011-05-24 |
|||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | GRIPS Policy Research Center | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 関連サイト | ||||||||
| 関連タイプ | isIdenticalTo | |||||||
| 識別子タイプ | URI | |||||||
| 関連識別子 | https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/11-03.html | |||||||
| 関連名称 | https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/11-03.html | |||||||
| 著者情報 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | https://www.grips.ac.jp/list/jp/facultyinfo/kanemoto_yoshitsugu/ | |||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||
| 出版タイプ | AM | |||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | |||||||
