WEKO3
アイテム
Using experimental manipulation of questionnaire design and a Kenyan panel to test for the reliability of reported perceptions of climate change and adaptation
https://doi.org/10.24545/00001724
https://doi.org/10.24545/000017240488e03e-268b-4078-9f65-a11125f9b42f
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
DP19-30.pdf (342.3 kB)
|
|
| Item type | ディスカッションペーパー / Discussion Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2020-01-15 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | Using experimental manipulation of questionnaire design and a Kenyan panel to test for the reliability of reported perceptions of climate change and adaptation | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | climate change adaptation | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | framing effects | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | recall bias | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | Kenya | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ | technical report | |||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||
| ID登録 (DOI) | 10.24545/00001724 | |||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||
| 著者 |
MUNRO, Alistair
× MUNRO, Alistair
|
|||||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||||
| 値 | 政策研究大学院大学 / National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies | |||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | While the use of surveys to understand perception of climate change and adaptation is common in research on agriculture, the reliability of aspects of the methodology is still largely untested. In particular there is limited evidence on (i) the degree to which measures of perception are sensitive to questionnaire design (ii) the accuracy of recall methods for climate change and (iii) the degree to which measures of adaptation based on recall from one-time surveys match the historical record. Using an established panel of farmers from across Kenya and a split sample method, I test both the sensitivity of stated perceptions of climate change to question format and the accuracy of recalled adaptations. In one treatment farmers face open-ended questions about temperature and rainfall changes while in the other treatment farmers are offered closed-end questions. Both approaches are common in the voluminous literature on climate change adaptation. Responses are highly sensitive to question format, both in the degree of perceived change and in the types of changes. Stated adaptations are not so sensitive to question format, but still diverge. Stated adaptations do not correspond well to the historical record of farming practices over the 15 years of the panel. Overall, the evidence suggests that researchers and policy-makers should be highly cautious in their use of subjective perceptions of climate change and the use of adaptation measures based on recall data. | |||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | I gratefully acknowledge funding from the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies for piloting work and from JSPS Kakenhi Grant Number 25101002 for the main eld work. | |||||||
| 発行年 | ||||||||
| 値 | 2020-01 | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
en : GRIPS Discussion Papers Report No. DP19-30, 発行日 2020-01-15 |
|||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | GRIPS Policy Research Center | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 関連サイト | ||||||||
| 関連タイプ | isIdenticalTo | |||||||
| 識別子タイプ | URI | |||||||
| 関連識別子 | https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/19-30.html | |||||||
| 関連名称 | https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/19-30.html | |||||||
| 著者情報 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | https://www.grips.ac.jp/list/jp/facultyinfo/munro_alistair/ | |||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||
| 出版タイプ | AM | |||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | |||||||
