ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "7c78cb65-39fb-41f8-9bf4-4d67fb7d286c"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "971", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "971"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:grips.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000971", "sets": ["16"]}, "author_link": ["6119", "6118"], "item_12_date_21": {"attribute_name": "登録日", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_date_issued_datetime": "2007-06-01"}]}, "item_12_description_6": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Under the belief-system of bureaucratic infallibility which is epitomized by the “Duality of government” (J. Iio), a fall of trust in the bureaucracy which was caused by a series of maladministrations at the 1990s is a serious challenge to the existing regime. Seen in the context of “latent function” (R. K. Merton), the system of policy evaluation has been introduced to cope with this crisis as it is believed to have a faculty of legitimizing the bureaucracy by means of capitalizing on its renowned professionalism. This paper aims at expounding how, and to what extent, the existing system of evaluation which is characterized as “enforced self-evaluation” has measured up to such an expectation. The exposition that follows is founded basically on (1) the summary review of evaluation reports drawn up by ministries and agencies, (2) the results of a questionnaire survey conducted by Mr. Tanabe, and (3) a detailed analysis of the evaluation report produced by a particular ministry. Though it is too early to draw a conclusion in any definite form, the expectation seems to have been met to some extent, especially through the mechanism of convertibility of policy evaluation and evaluation of organization.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_12_description_8": {"attribute_name": "分野", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "政治学 / Political Science and International Relations", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_12_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "6119", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "伊藤, 大一"}]}]}, "item_12_publisher_12": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "GRIPS Policy Information Center"}]}, "item_12_record_name_9": {"attribute_name": "シリーズ名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_record_name": "GRIPS Discussion Papers"}]}, "item_12_relation_16": {"attribute_name": "関連サイト", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_name": [{"subitem_relation_name_text": "https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/07-01.html"}], "subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/07-01.html", "subitem_relation_type_select": "URI"}}]}, "item_12_text_10": {"attribute_name": "発行年", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "2007-06"}]}, "item_12_text_5": {"attribute_name": "著者所属", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "政策研究大学院大学 / National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies"}]}, "item_12_volume_11": {"attribute_name": "Report No.", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_volume": "07-01"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "metadata only access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "ITO, Daiichi"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "6118", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "technical report", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18gh"}]}, "item_title": "The System of Policy Evaluation in Japan", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "The System of Policy Evaluation in Japan"}]}, "item_type_id": "12", "owner": "3", "path": ["16"], "permalink_uri": "https://grips.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/971", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2007-06-01"}, "publish_date": "2007-06-01", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "971", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["The System of Policy Evaluation in Japan"], "weko_shared_id": 3}
  1. ディスカッション・ペーパー
  2. 2007年度

The System of Policy Evaluation in Japan

https://grips.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/971
https://grips.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/971
11294f6c-fe02-451f-901b-99fd0d33e9c3
Item type ディスカッションペーパー / Discussion Paper(1)
公開日 2007-06-01
タイトル
タイトル The System of Policy Evaluation in Japan
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ technical report
アクセス権
アクセス権 metadata only access
著者 ITO, Daiichi

× ITO, Daiichi

WEKO 6118

ITO, Daiichi

Search repository
著者別名
姓名 伊藤, 大一
著者所属
政策研究大学院大学 / National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
分野
内容記述 政治学 / Political Science and International Relations
抄録
内容記述 Under the belief-system of bureaucratic infallibility which is epitomized by the “Duality of government” (J. Iio), a fall of trust in the bureaucracy which was caused by a series of maladministrations at the 1990s is a serious challenge to the existing regime. Seen in the context of “latent function” (R. K. Merton), the system of policy evaluation has been introduced to cope with this crisis as it is believed to have a faculty of legitimizing the bureaucracy by means of capitalizing on its renowned professionalism. This paper aims at expounding how, and to what extent, the existing system of evaluation which is characterized as “enforced self-evaluation” has measured up to such an expectation. The exposition that follows is founded basically on (1) the summary review of evaluation reports drawn up by ministries and agencies, (2) the results of a questionnaire survey conducted by Mr. Tanabe, and (3) a detailed analysis of the evaluation report produced by a particular ministry. Though it is too early to draw a conclusion in any definite form, the expectation seems to have been met to some extent, especially through the mechanism of convertibility of policy evaluation and evaluation of organization.
発行年
2007-06
出版者
出版者 GRIPS Policy Information Center
関連サイト
識別子タイプ URI
関連識別子 https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/07-01.html
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-20 15:54:40.982663
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3